On Tuesday, Gucci-owner Kering SA said third-quarter sales excluding currency movements and mergers and acquisitions fell 9%, worse than the 6% decline expected by analysts. That’s in stark contrast with Hermes International SCA, which beat estimates and said it saw no signs of demand waning among its well-heeled clientele in any of its markets. In the same vein, last week billionaire-favorite Brunello Cucinelli SpA upgraded its revenue forecast for the third time this year.The dichotomy can be explained by sharply different customer bases.
Confidence has crumbled among the simply affluent in the US and in Europe. Meanwhile, the uber-wealthy have continued to spend. That’s corresponded with a shift in fashion trends from ostentation to more refined elegance. Hermes and cashmere-maker Cucinelli tick this box. Kering does not. In fact, it has appealed to young, fashion-obsessed shoppers in the US and China, who are now either feeling the pinch from inflation and higher borrowing costs or have moved on to other designers. The company must therefore pivot to buyers in the very top echelons as much as it can, even if this brings some short-term pain as it raises prices, reins in its fashion flair and cuts back on selling through some third-party retailers.All of this won’t be easy. Gucci, the group’s biggest brand, accounting for about half of sales and about two-thirds of operating profit last year, is already transitioning from the bold maximalism of former creative director Alessandro Michele to a sleeker aesthetic under new top designer Sabato de Sarno.De Sarno’s first collection of pared-back looks, which debuted last month in Milan, should help Gucci become more in tune with the current zeitgeist and appeal to older, upmarket customers.An injection of enthusiasm is needed. Gucci’s organic sales fell 7% in the third quarter, worse than the 6.2% expected by analysts. Kering said the collection had been well received. But the first items won’t be in stores until the end of January. Investors will need to be patient to see the full transformation, particularly because Gucci’s operating margin will fall by 2 percentage points this year, with little improvement next.
But Gucci isn’t the only Kering brand coming apart at the seams. Yves Saint Laurent is facing competition from LVMH’s Celine and Loewe, which are firing on all cylinders. That explains some of the 12% decline in organic sales in the third quarter, as local customers in North America and western Europe, which make up 57% of total retail sales, taper their spending. Meanwhile, US department stores are ordering less.Kering does have some levers it can pull to reorient the business toward the twin drivers of understated luxury and the super-rich’s enduring purchasing power.First of all, it must continue undeterred with Gucci’s reinvention, as this will be the most crucial driver of its fortunes over the next few years. But Kering must ensure that its new creative direction has enough freshness to tempt customers to buy, while efforts to elevate clothes and accessories — and charge more — are accompanied by commensurate strides in staying power.While Saint Laurent faces competition, it does operate in the more subdued luxury space. Kering should continue to develop the brand, even if it means some lost sales, as aspirational shoppers are priced out and it cuts back on where clothes and accessories are sold. Success with high-end womenswear and handbags priced at €3,000 ($3,176) and above show the potential.Bottega Veneta’s performance, too, is being muddied by efforts to make the brand more exclusive, with organic sales falling 7% in the third quarterคำพูดจาก สล็อตเว็บตรง. Even so, it can push its Intrecciato woven leather bags and curved heel shoes much further. If Kering can get this right — and let’s not forget that despite its recent woes, it is a master of turbo-charging brands — the Italian house has a good chance of filling some of the void until Gucci is powering ahead againคำพูดจาก สล็อตเว็บตรง. It’s notable that both Saint Laurent and Bottega Veneta are performing well in China.Right now though, investors are skeptical. The shares fell as much as 5% in early trading Wednesday and are down about 17% this year, underperforming most rivals. They trade on a forward price-to-earnings ratio of about 13 times, a steep discount to LVMH’s about 20 times. To close the gap, Kering must ensure that its makeover is more old money than nouveau riche.